<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for RJW3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjw3.net/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjw3.net/blog</link>
	<description>The thoughts and words of Robert J Wolfington III</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:26:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The real cost of news by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.rjw3.net/blog/2010/01/the-real-cost-of-news/comment-page-1/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjw3.net/blog/?p=542#comment-242</guid>
		<description>I think papers like the three I work on are safe for the moment but I do think the New York Times, Star Tribune and other &quot;national&quot; papers are the ones who are on the chopping block.

Citizen journalism is a good thing but we&#039;re also entering a world where opinion is news re:cable news channels.

I&#039;m heading to a newspaper convention next week and I&#039;m sure it&#039;ll be the talk of the show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think papers like the three I work on are safe for the moment but I do think the New York Times, Star Tribune and other &#8220;national&#8221; papers are the ones who are on the chopping block.</p>
<p>Citizen journalism is a good thing but we&#8217;re also entering a world where opinion is news re:cable news channels.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m heading to a newspaper convention next week and I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;ll be the talk of the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The real cost of news by jamEs</title>
		<link>http://www.rjw3.net/blog/2010/01/the-real-cost-of-news/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>jamEs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjw3.net/blog/?p=542#comment-241</guid>
		<description>I agree with your point about local news.  There is tonnes of news I wouldn&#039;t be exposed to if I didn&#039;t read the local paper. I think the issue newspaper faces is that they can&#039;t beat the immediacy of the web and Twitter in particular.  Citizen journalism seems to be gaining traction more and more.  One of the sites I read regularly was reporting today a story I saw on Twitter yesterday as a news piece.  It&#039;s gone from reporters being on the scene to now everyone being a reporter and having a network to distribute news.  The reality is we&#039;re probably going to sacrifice local news and event coverage in the name of progress, as sad as that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your point about local news.  There is tonnes of news I wouldn&#8217;t be exposed to if I didn&#8217;t read the local paper. I think the issue newspaper faces is that they can&#8217;t beat the immediacy of the web and Twitter in particular.  Citizen journalism seems to be gaining traction more and more.  One of the sites I read regularly was reporting today a story I saw on Twitter yesterday as a news piece.  It&#8217;s gone from reporters being on the scene to now everyone being a reporter and having a network to distribute news.  The reality is we&#8217;re probably going to sacrifice local news and event coverage in the name of progress, as sad as that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
