<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The real cost of news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjw3.net/blog/2010/01/the-real-cost-of-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjw3.net/blog/2010/01/the-real-cost-of-news/</link>
	<description>Robert Wolfington&#039;s Notebook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 22:20:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dana yost</title>
		<link>http://www.rjw3.net/blog/2010/01/the-real-cost-of-news/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>dana yost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 22:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjw3.net/blog/?p=542#comment-17</guid>
		<description>The point is very important for newspapers (and their readers) to come to terms with. If readers are not willing to pay because they can get their news from &quot;free&quot; sites, pretty soon those free sites — which at some point down the line get their news from paid reporters — will cease to exist, too, and certainly those that offer exclusively local news will go away as well. I don&#039;t think anyone is going to cover local council meetings or ball games for free.

* portion edited by RJW3

d</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point is very important for newspapers (and their readers) to come to terms with. If readers are not willing to pay because they can get their news from &#8220;free&#8221; sites, pretty soon those free sites — which at some point down the line get their news from paid reporters — will cease to exist, too, and certainly those that offer exclusively local news will go away as well. I don&#8217;t think anyone is going to cover local council meetings or ball games for free.</p>
<p>* portion edited by RJW3</p>
<p>d</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.rjw3.net/blog/2010/01/the-real-cost-of-news/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjw3.net/blog/?p=542#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I think papers like the three I work on are safe for the moment but I do think the New York Times, Star Tribune and other &quot;national&quot; papers are the ones who are on the chopping block.

Citizen journalism is a good thing but we&#039;re also entering a world where opinion is news re:cable news channels.

I&#039;m heading to a newspaper convention next week and I&#039;m sure it&#039;ll be the talk of the show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think papers like the three I work on are safe for the moment but I do think the New York Times, Star Tribune and other &#8220;national&#8221; papers are the ones who are on the chopping block.</p>
<p>Citizen journalism is a good thing but we&#8217;re also entering a world where opinion is news re:cable news channels.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m heading to a newspaper convention next week and I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;ll be the talk of the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamEs</title>
		<link>http://www.rjw3.net/blog/2010/01/the-real-cost-of-news/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>jamEs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rjw3.net/blog/?p=542#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I agree with your point about local news.  There is tonnes of news I wouldn&#039;t be exposed to if I didn&#039;t read the local paper. I think the issue newspaper faces is that they can&#039;t beat the immediacy of the web and Twitter in particular.  Citizen journalism seems to be gaining traction more and more.  One of the sites I read regularly was reporting today a story I saw on Twitter yesterday as a news piece.  It&#039;s gone from reporters being on the scene to now everyone being a reporter and having a network to distribute news.  The reality is we&#039;re probably going to sacrifice local news and event coverage in the name of progress, as sad as that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your point about local news.  There is tonnes of news I wouldn&#8217;t be exposed to if I didn&#8217;t read the local paper. I think the issue newspaper faces is that they can&#8217;t beat the immediacy of the web and Twitter in particular.  Citizen journalism seems to be gaining traction more and more.  One of the sites I read regularly was reporting today a story I saw on Twitter yesterday as a news piece.  It&#8217;s gone from reporters being on the scene to now everyone being a reporter and having a network to distribute news.  The reality is we&#8217;re probably going to sacrifice local news and event coverage in the name of progress, as sad as that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

